Nature Groups File Newhall Ranch Suit

Several environmental groups filed a joint lawsuit against Los Angeles County on Thursday for approving the 21,000-home Newhall Ranch development in the northwest Santa Clarita Valley.

The suit — brought by the Center for Biological Diversity, the Sierra Club, Friends of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Organization for Planning the Environment, the Wishtoyo Foundation and its Ventura Coastkeeper program — asks the court to review the legality of the county’s approval process, supporters said.

The development will “impart irreversible impacts to the ecological integrity and water quality of the Santa Clara River watershed and Ventura’s coastal waters, harming the well-being of watershed residents and visitors for years to come,” said Jason Weiner, associate director and staff attorney for the Ventura Coastkeeper program.

Newhall Land Development Inc. spokeswoman Marlee Lauffer said the development firm, which proposed Newhall Ranch, has not yet received a copy of the lawsuit.

But the issues raised by the group have been frequently addressed over the 17-year history of the proposed development’s consideration, she said.

“We know that Newhall Ranch has been thoroughly reviewed and analyzed and there is no merit to their lawsuit,” Lauffer said.

“While it’s disappointing that they’ve chosen to file this lawsuit, it’s certainly not a surprise,” she said.

Newhall Ranch would add some 21,000 homes to the Santa Clarita Valley between Interstate 5 and the Ventura County line near Highway 126.

Newhall Ranch would include residential and commercial centers in four distinct “villages,” which would be constructed in phases.

First proposed in 1994, Newhall Ranch has been through 17 years of reviews, with 109,444 pages of documents examining its compliance with county, state and federal regulations.

Three of five county supervisors OK’d its first phase on Feb. 20.

Rare animals
Plaintiffs in the lawsuit claim the development will destroy one of the last remaining wetlands in Southern California.

“This project strikes at the heart of the Santa Clara River,” said Ileene Anderson of the Center for Biological Diversity.
“The river is the last free-flowing river in Los Angeles County,” she said. “It’s important to preserve it and keep it intact.

“Not only does it harbor rare species of animals, such as the (unarmored threespine) stickleback fish, but rare plants, as well.”

The Santa Clara River is one of two major Southern California rivers remaining in a relatively natural state.
It flows for about 116 miles from its headwaters on the north slope of the San Gabriel Mountains near Acton to its confluence with the Pacific Ocean between Oxnard and Ventura.

Plants and animals indigenous to the Santa Clara River watershed include the California condor, least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, California red-legged frog, arroyo toad, southern steelhead trout and San Fernando Valley spineflower.

County approval
County supervisors last month approved three recommendations submitted to them by Newhall Land for developing the southwest corner of Highway 126 and Interstate 5 along the Santa Clara River.

After receiving approval, Newhall Land officials said they expect to start building homes for the development’s first phase as early as a year and a half from approval.

Although unlikely, the lawsuit issued Thursday by the coalition of five environmental groups could derail the project, Anderson said.

The coalition had 30 days from the time of county approval to file the suit and did so on the last day.
Signal Staff Writer Tammy Marashlian contributed to this report.

Click HERE for the article.

UPDATE: Environmental Groups Sue County Over Newhall Ranch Approval

Several environmental groups filed a joint lawsuit against Los Angeles County on Thursday for approving the 21,000 Newhall Ranch development in the northwest Santa Clarita Valley.

The suit — brought by the Center for Biological Diversity, the Sierra Club, Friends of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Organization for Planning the Environment, the Wishtoyo Foundation and its Ventura Coastkeeper program — asks the court to review the legality of the county’s approval process, supporters said.

The development will “impart irreversible impacts to the ecological integrity and water quality of the Santa Clara River watershed and Ventura’s coastal waters, harming the wellbeing of watershed residents and visitors for years to come,” said Jason Weiner, associate director and staff attorney for the Ventura Coastkeeper program.

Newhall Land Development Inc. spokeswoman Marlee Lauffer said the development firm, which proposed Newhall Ranch, has not yet received a copy of the lawsuit.

But the issues raised by the group have been frequently addressed during the more than 17-year history of the proposed development’s consideration, she said.

“We know that Newhall Ranch has been thoroughly reviewed and analyzed and there is no merit to their lawsuit,” Lauffer said.

“While it’s disappointing that they’ve chosen to file this lawsuit, it’s certainly not a surprise,” she said.
Newhall Ranch would add some 21,000 homes to the Santa Clarita Valley between Interstate 5 and the Ventura County line near Highway 126.

Newhall Ranch would include residential and commercial centers in four distinct “villages,” which would be constructed in phases.

First proposed in 1994, Newhall Ranch has been through 17 years of reviews, with 109,444 pages of documents examining its compliance with county, state and federal regulations.

Three of the five county supervisors OK’d its first phase on Feb. 20.

Plaintiffs in the lawsuit claim the development will destroy one of the last remaining wetlands in Southern California.

“This project strikes at the heart of the Santa Clara River,” said Ileene Anderson of the Center for Biological Diversity.

“The river is the last free-flowing river in Los Angeles County,” she said. “It’s important to preserve it and keep it intact.

“Not only does it harbor rare species of animals such as the (unarmored threespine) stickleback fish, but rare plants as well.”

The Santa Clara River is one of two major Southern California rivers remaining in a relatively natural state.

It flows for about 116 miles from its headwaters on the north slope of the San Gabriel Mountains near Acton to its confluence with the Pacific Ocean between Oxnard and Ventura.

Plants and animals indigenous to the Santa Clara River watershed include: the California condor, least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, California red-legged frog, arroyo toad, southern steelhead trout and San Fernando Valley spineflower.

County supervisors last month approved three recommendations submitted to them by Newhall Land for developing the southwest corner of Highway 126 and Interstate 5 along the Santa Clara River.

After receiving approval, Newhall Land officials said they expect to start building homes for the development’s first phase as early as a year and a half from approval.

Although unlikely, the lawsuit issued Thursday by the coalition of five environmental groups could derail the project, Anderson said.

The coalition had 30 days from the time of county approval to file the suit and did so on the last day.

Click HERE for the article.

SCOPE, 4 Others File Suit to Block Newhall Ranch

The Tucson-based Center for Biological Diversity announced Thursday it and four other environmental organizations including Santa Clarita Organzation for Planning and the Environment have filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court in an attempt to block the eventual 20,880-home Newhall Ranch “mini city” west of Interstate 5.

SCOPE and the Center and other litigants including Friends of the Santa Clara River have previously sued the county at various stages of approval for the project, which is being developed by The Newhall Land and Farming Co.

Triggering the latest lawsuit was the Board of Supervisors’ Feb. 22 approval of the 1,444-home first phase of Newhall Ranch, called Landmark Village. Passed on a 3-0 vote of the board – Supervisors Gloria Molina and Zev Yaroslavsky abstained for unstated reasons – Landmark Village would span 263 acres and include 70 single-family homes, 1,105 multi-family units and 69 mixed-use units between Highway 126 on the north and Six Flags Magic Mountain on the southeast.

The new lawsuit should come as no suprise to the county or to the developer. Newhall Land spokeswoman Marlee Lauffer said in February the first Landmark Village homes could be built in 18 to 24 months, but that the time frame would depend chiefly on the status of active and threatened environmental lawsuits.

 

Thursday’s full press release from the Center for Biological Diversity follows:

 

Lawsuit Filed Against L.A. County Approval of Massive Newhall Ranch Project

A coalition of five public-interest groups today sued Los Angeles County in Superior Court over its approval of permits for the first phase of the sprawling Newhall Ranch development — one of the largest single residential development projects ever contemplated in California — which is proposed for 12,000 acres along the Santa Clara River in northwest L.A. County. Newhall Ranch would create a city of more than 60,000 on a six-mile stretch of the river that is currently rugged open space and farmland by channeling the county’s last mostly free-flowing river.

The construction approved by the county on Feb. 23 would require filling of the Santa Clara River’s floodplain on a large scale; channelizing over three miles of river and converting many tributary streams to concrete-lined channels; unearth and desecrate American Indian burial sites, sacred places and cultural natural resources such as the California condor; and threaten the San Fernando Valley spineflower — a species found in only one other location on the planet.

“It’s appalling that L.A. County would be so reckless with the last free-flowing river in the region,” said Ron Bottorff with the Friends of the Santa Clara River. “This area has lost all but 3 percent of its historic river woodlands; the county’s approval would replace some of the finest riparian areas remaining anywhere in Southern California with ugly strip malls and housing we don’t need.”

The Santa Clara River is one of two major Southern California rivers remaining in a relatively natural state. It flows for about 116 miles from its headwaters on the north slope of the San Gabriel Mountains near Acton to its confluence with the Pacific Ocean between Oxnard and Ventura; its watershed is home to a great diversity of very rare species, among them the unarmored threespine stickleback fish, California condor, least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, California red-legged frog, arroyo toad, Southern California steelhead trout and San Fernando Valley spineflower. Wildlands of the Santa Clara River provides a full accounting of rare environmental resources of this precious landscape.

Said the Sierra Club’s Jennifer Robinson: “The Sierra Club has fought throughout the nation and internationally for floodplain and river protection. As part of this national focus, it is only fitting that the 50,000-member Angeles Chapter should continue its longstanding battle to protect Los Angeles County’s last free-flowing river, the Santa Clara River, with legal opposition to a project that will be built almost entirely in its floodplain.”

“Developing in a river floodplain is never a good idea,” said Ileene Anderson, biologist with the Center for Biological Diversity. “We should protect our precious water resources, not destroy them.”

The suit was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court under the California Environmental Quality Act, and will include additional “Map Act” and “Plan Consistency” issues. Brought by the Center for Biological Diversity, the Sierra Club, Friends of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Organization for Planning the Environment (SCOPE), and Wishtoyo Foundation and its Ventura Coastkeeper program, the suit will ask the court to review the legality of the county’s approval process in order to protect this last remaining river resource area.

Los Angeles County approved an overall plan for the Newhall Ranch development in 2003. After promising groundbreaking for the project in 2000, approval of this first phase some 12 years later is the first authorization permitting construction. Plans have been slowed by the bankruptcy of LandSource Communities Development, the predecessor of Newhall Ranch’s current developer. CalPERS, California’s public pension fund, lost $970 million of state employees’ investment in Newhall Ranch with the LandSource bankruptcy. Now, with the infusion of cash and majority ownership by several out-of-state hedge funds, investors are again looking to move forward on this destructive and  questionable proposal.

“Before a single house has been built, Newhall Ranch has already cost California’s taxpayers and workforce, including the county’s own staff, nearly a billion dollars of lost pension funds,” said Lynne Plambeck, president of the Santa Clarita Organization for Planning the Environment. “Although the state will never recover any of the largest single loss ever suffered by CalPERS, and will spend millions more in public monies to build roads, bridges and other infrastructure to serve this project, the county has once again endorsed this same development that will threaten the region’s water supply, worsen air pollution and cause further gridlock on our highways.”

“The project will impart irreversible impacts to the ecological integrity and water quality of the Santa Clara River watershed and Ventura’s coastal waters, harming the wellbeing of watershed residents and visitors for years to come,” said Jason Weiner, associate director and staff attorney for the Wishtoyo Foundation’s Ventura Coastkeeper Program.

“The impacts to hundreds upon hundreds of our burial sites, and natural cultural resources such as the California condor that are such a vital component of our culture and religious practices, will be devastating and irreversible,” said Mati Waiya, a Chumash ceremonial elder and executive director of the Wishtoyo Foundation.

“The project information was substantially changed at the last minute just prior to the final hearing before the county supervisors,” said attorney Dean Wallraff. “The public and the decision-makers should have a document they can read through in a straightforward way to understand the environmental impacts of the project, and this isn’t it.”

Click HERE for the article.

Stay in the Loop about the Newhall Ranch Development

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates about the Newhall Ranch Project.

You have Successfully Subscribed!